Thursday, September 20, 2007

i like people who wreck. homes.

this may come as a shock to many (or not) but i like michelle branch. and vanessa carlton. they write catchy pop music. let me say that again: they write catchy pop music.

the state of women in music today is dire. DIRE. and i feel that michelle branch and vanessa carlton get unfairly lumped into the britney and avril camp. they are both musicians and artists as opposed to marketing ploys. and because they write the words they sing, they are a voice in music today that is rarely heard: the voice of young girls growing up.

in vanessa carlton's song "white houses," she sings about losing her virginity. from the joy of new, bestest friends to crush and obsession with insignificant details ("he's so funny in his bright red shirt") to the disappointment of the aftermath; the disappointment of growing up. i've seen one tree hill and buffy and everwood and the other shows that imply and show but never say, not really. i mean have you ever heard something this honest on tv or in popular movies or music?

my first time, hard to explain
rush of blood, oh, and a little bit of pain
on a cloudy day, it's more common than you think
he's my first mistake

now we have all gossiped about britney and christina and mandy's virginity from the time they claimed it to the rumors of when they lost it. they were coy and vague. and they sure as hell never came out and said that it had happened, let alone mentioned blood or pain. but there are millions of girls out there going through that experience without any representation in popular culture. and the point of music (or one of them) is to make you feel like what your going through makes sense.

i also have a thing for liberal pop country - you know, the dixie chicks and now, michelle branch's new collaboration the wreckers (purportedly a shortening of 'the cass county home wreckers' which is what michelle's husband nicknamed her and her friend and collaborator jessica harp). i like about a third of the album a lot ... which is pretty impressive for me frankly. oddly enough i created a playlist that consisted of my favorite songs of bad religion's new album 'new maps of hell' (new dark ages, requiem for dissent, honest goodbye, dearly beloved, grains of wrath, scrutiny, and prodigal son) and favorite songs off the wrecker's album 'leave the pieces' (leave the pieces, tennesse, stand still look pretty, cigarettes). of these songs on my playlist, i think michelle and/or jessica wrote all but one and i think that plays into my enjoyment of the songs. we're around the same age, they are into tattoos (michelle has got a pretty hot pin up tattoo on her forearm these days) ... it's a match made in great theory. the point is that i like these songs because a) i like catchy songs that aren't contrived b) i like pop country and the real clincher c) the lyrics say something that i think i would say; i could say those things and mean them (unlike, say, 'hit me baby one more time.') but even beyond that there lyrics are honest and it's a kind of honesty that we rarely hear from female artists today:

see i left another
good man tonight
i wonder if he'll miss me
lord knows i tried

but i think maybe
the thing that i did wrong
was put up with his bullshit
for far too long

i think i might like
the quiet nights
of this empty life ...
from cigarettes

compare that to 'You're so fine/I want you to be mine/You're so delicious/I think about you all the time' (avril lavigne's newest hit 'girlfriend').

even better, though, is that michelle is honest about herself and her life and not in a 'feel bad for me i make millions of dollars kind of way':

i am slowly falling apart
i wish you'd take a walk in my shoes for a start
you might think it's easy being me
you just stand still, look pretty
from stand still, look pretty

now why does it matter if women's voices are represented in pop culture? or anywhere for that matter?

i've been asked this question many times, especially in the context of workplace diversity. i always tell the same story:

in the beginning days of heart bypass surgery there was an inordinate number of women who died from the procedure. the doctor's couldn't figure out what was causing this. women's immune system? their period? what? it turns out it was because woman are, on average, physically smaller than men and the tools used were too big and popping their arteries. Here's the thing: had women been included in the study (the fda didn't require women to be a part of studies until the last 5 or so years), then these women might not have died. there are other factors of course but this seems pretty basic to me.

of course, music isn't quite as dire as say, heart surgery. but for some, it can be pretty important, especially during adolescence. moreover, if we're not telling women's stories in popular culture, it's not just women who lose out. men do too. many of us learn to relate to each other (sadly) through tv, music, movies and without an honest, true female voice we tend to operate on different wavelengths (venus and mars, for example). but i don't believe that's inherent; i believe it's because we each have false preconceived notions about the behavior, motivation, and feelings of the other gender and thus, we operate under false assumptions and get angry and confused when these assumptions - which we hold to be truths - don't turn out how we planned.

but you don't have to like michelle branch or vanessa carlton to support women in music (although, try to search out female artists that play the type of music you like, maybe you'd be surprised?). you can support rock camp for girls!

i personally am on the advisory board for the new york city willie mae rock camp for girls! hooray!

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

more pitchfork + bad religion

i admit it. i was spurred to search pitchfork for bad religion reviews after hearing that a friend's hipsterific brother stopped liking bad religion after pitchfork called their lyrics 'politics for seventh graders.' (let's not even get into the fact that this person blindly follows pitchfork ...) the previous post on their review of los angeles is burning was just my first foray.

next in google's "more from pitchforkmedia.com" is:

the process of belief:

well i respect them for not dissing too hard on br; on refusing to give their readers what they want: "You want to see your friendly neighborhood elitist thoroughly skewering a band long past its prime." (what does that say about their readers? only 28 year olds in girls jeans one size too small plastered on by the modern marvel of spandex can make good music?) at least, they are mildly aware of the roots of the shitty hipster indie rock crap they listen to.

but it's statements like these that i really don't understand: "Obvious pleas for radio play, like the mid-tempo and acoustic-flavored "Broken," make you feel a little sorry for the band and their memories of brief mid-nineties alt-rock stardom (sing it: "You and me-ee/ Have a disea-ease!")"

let's review something here ...

the highest a bad religion song ever charted on the us modern rock charts (never hot 100) was 11 ... and it was 21st Century Digital Boy not Infected. (Infected only got to 27). That was over 10 years ago. Somehow I don't think a band that has been around since 1980, that seems to be doing quite well financially, and in which most members have kids and other jobs is really looking for that #1 in celebrity magazine hit. I guess it's just me but maybe, just maybe, they, as Jay Bentley says in their latest dvd, "want what they have." Bad Religion makes good money off their music ... what else can a punk rock band ask for? Personally Bad Religion with their just under the radar record sales in the hundreds of thousands (250,000 to 800,000) is something to aspire to. Plus I look like an ice cream cone in skinny jeans.


Don't get me wrong I don't think Process of Belief is their best album and yes, Bad Religion can do wrong. I just don't trust the self-proclaimed "elitist" who consistently lists animal collective under best new music.


~ * ~ * ~

ah-ha! found it! the impetus for the search!

"Therefore, I think discovering Bad Religion and their Chomsky for Dummies rhetoric is an important experience for a youth in his/her formative musical years. Sure, their politics are a little flimsy and idealistic (the line "when all soldiers lay their weapons down" would make even a 1967 Haight-Ashbury drum circle queasy), but Graffin's lyrics at least can plant questions in a seventh grader's brain more profound than whether that girl in study hall likes him. And it's all delivered in the kind of sugar-high sonic package that speaks most directly to the age range in question."

I can barely begin here. Are you saying that adults who like bad religion are intellectually immature? That punk rock is only for kids (kind of like trix)? Bad Religion has the largest age range of fans of any band i know.

And Chomsky for Dummies? Flimsy and idealistic? Here they call it "thesaurus rock."

Have they ever actually written a song? Have they ever tried to use "transubstantiation" in a lyric?

The truth is that pitchfork media exemplifies the old adage that those who do do and those who can't teach ... or in this case, review. Now I don't believe that of teachers but I definitely believe it of critics and reviewers of all kinds.

More importantly, we forget that songs are not dissertations (which Greg Graffin has successfully completed for his Ph.fucking.D). They are short and rhymed and there is no way that a song could ever capture the nuance of life, especially politics. Songs are a moment of thought and feeling and shouldn't be held to the standard of say, Chomsky's books. And if you read Greg Graffin's books and articles you will find a very well-read, intellectual, solid mind. More importantly, why don't you try to fit a Chomsky book into 2 minutes of verse/chorus/verse? oh right, because you can't even strum an E chord.

once upon a time pitchfork media reviewed los angeles is burning ....

Read the article here.

"The irony of it all is that the band's call-and-response vocal arrangements are straight out of a Baptist church house, as are the rich harmonies and the reliance on one man-- in this case, Graffin-- to testify to (and for) the congregation. Bad Religion's magic doesn't stem as much from their political lyrics as from the airtight arrangements and thick, sweet harmonies that bring the lyrics to you, and interestingly, are also the antithesis of the social rebellion the band advocates. A case could be made (and sometimes I make it) that the band resorts to the very things it deplores in order to get across a message, and that in the process, they demand a kind of allegiance that a cynic might call unhealthy. But if Graffin and Gurewitz are willing to return to the well to help the innocent climb out, the end certainly justifies the means. "

Um, what?

Just because they use musical techniques developed in a church (which ps - everyone does because that's how music developed) doesn't mean they "resort to the very things [they] deplore"? I don't even understand what they are talking about? You can't have airtight arrangements and harmonies if you are an indie band or advocate for a social rebellion? The formualic songs written by record company execs in no way resemble Bad Religion. Pop music isn't evil in itself. I mean who doesn't like the Beatles? Have you heard the Ramones? Have you listened to Buddy Holly at a really fast speed … oh wait, that IS the Ramones.

Punk rock and social rebellion are about creating the world you live in and not just going along with the corporate, powerful, self-serving way. That does NOT mean doing something just because it's against authority. It means thinking about the actions that you take, the way you vote, the things you say. Sometimes those things may be in line with "authority;" sometimes not. The key thing is that it involes thinking and thoughfully doing things your way. And that's exactly what Bad Religion does and has done for 18(?) years.

Perhaps ironically, blink 182 said it best: (I'm paraphrasing here) a kid who won't listen to anything because it's on the radio is just as bad as a kid who will only listen to something because it's on the radio.